Handbrake nvenc quality benchmark reddit. With crf when set what.

• Handbrake nvenc quality benchmark reddit When I changed to NVENC it show RF instead CQ (I don't know both of theys meanings. GPU 3070 and A380. Being that I could tell, and I'm in no hurry, I'll keep chugging along at CPU speeds for now. However using handbrake i can adjust the quality. Just slide all the way to the right for highest quality which employs the most advanced algorithm and also gives smallest file size for given image quality. Members Online Nvenc AV1 is out on latest snapshot builds. Testing out on a movie called "Y Tu Mama Tambien", I encoded once with Constant Quality set to 27 and speed set to medium. nvenc av1 and qsv av1 have very similar vmaf scores at various bitrates on best presets. 259mb vs 357mb Constant Quality - 18 Video Encoder H. Video encoder: H. I do not have a custom Handbrake install, though I would like to have one, but I am not well versed in the process required to make a custom Handbrake build. 264. The benchmarks (and not just Epos Vox's latest work) makes this fairly clear. x265 was kind of an oddball there, where the rational choices seem to be veryfast or slow and everything else is confused. Firstly, you can encode in x265 regardless of whether you are using your CPU or GPU (i. com)) -- After a bit of testing, I decided to create new thread with my quality-related findings. NVENC as well as Intel Quicksync are designed more for real time encoding and won't be as bitrate efficient as encoding non-realtime via CPU. what I'd like to know is the delta. For me, usually, the time is actually the most problematic part of the encoding. The short version is that 'x264 slow is better than nvenc' used to be the conventional wisdom, particularly during earlier iterations of Nvenc, but Turing encoders that came in with the 1650 Super and above (which may include your 1660 super) are pretty much toe to toe with slow. Right now NVENC is going to eat any CPU's lunch. I'm also assuming that you've removed the cooler to check your thermal paste application or tried using a higher quality thermal paste? Would anyone be able to let me know what Constant Quality they use for NVENC X265 1080p? I have been experimenting with it, and 30 Constant Quality with the 'slowest' preset seems to provide a great output with a good reduction in file size. m4v 949MiB NVENC_10bit_SLOWEST_CQ0. An odd result considering all other settings remained the same in Handbrake. The short answer is 'well, it isn't, unless you're on an old card'. I am also using Arc's 3491 Beta. I am tuning for quality and size, not latency I am using the Newest HandBrake Nightly Build (Just Updated) and I am using a A380 Arc GPU. Depending on what codec you want to use, you'll want to change your card. Any software encoded video comes out at a smaller size, but much less quality in the fine detail. I found that x265 software encoder running with the "medium" Encoder Preset using RF 30 produced about the same file size (Approx 135MB) as NVENC 265 running at AV1 NVENC was the clear winner with faster compression speeds, comparable file size, and better quality. How to mix them? With time and a proper format (slow encoding, 10-bit, and not NVENC, not constant bitrate), for example. I know software is better, but sometimes I need it to be faster instead of taking all day XD and heard turing/ampere is equivalent to h264 (and gives me a chance to use my new gpu!)? This is the unofficial subreddit for the handbrake video Own_Ad_2272. Now for the CRF 18 it's just an indicator of the quality for the SAME settings. It's a shame the NVENC just doesn't output the same as standard. (compared to 10 with x265 on an Intel i7 7700K) For QC0 I do not see any negative quality impact on my LG OLED C9. If I use CQ when using the software encoder (H. The results are excellent for time frame, I am using Raw Deal 4K HDR UHD Version and encoding it to AV1. "Bad" is intrinsically subjective, so your question depends on me understanding what "bad" is for you. Slow will give a faster render time than the other two settings, and once you get to medium the quality starts to drop off a decent amount - although a lot of people can’t really tell the difference. With my 3070, i used to get between 300-400 fps (1080p video) With the 4080 i Only get 180-200fps (same video) Encoder on the 4080 is only used at about 30% (as show in task manager infos) For example: x265 vs x265(nvenc) or x265 10bit vs x265 10bit (nvenc) Maybe we shouldn't compare encoding time for now. GPU are considered to be very fast but the result is a bigger file and/or less quality. m4v 949MiB NVENC_10bit_SLOWEST_QC10. My Handbrake settings are quite simple: (Assuming the source media is HDR): H265 10-bit Constant Quality, with CRF = 18 I am moderately familiar with Handbrake and encoding; however, I am new to using many of what I believe to be "extra arguments" settings, and fine tuning my encodes in this manner. edit: never mind I understand what you're saying here having re-read your Constant quality RF: The quality you want the video to have. For example: x265 vs x265(nvenc) or x265 10bit vs x265 10bit (nvenc) Maybe we shouldn't compare encoding time for now. edit: never mind I understand what you're saying here having re-read your If anything the chart shows why releasers chose M6 to transcode everything. 264 (NVENC), Quality at 0, Slowest Encoder preset, Profile high and level 6. This leverages your GPU's dedicated encoding hardware for a significant speed boost. For comparable quality to THAT maybe 15 but you probably will be happy with 8mb. 265 outperforms x. thoughts of quality? Hello, And welcome to the community! For editing: Like u/The_real_Hresna said, you should consider using a DNxHR or ProRes codec for editing it's much better suited and the quality is better than re-encoding it into a H. MakeMKV is an all-in-one ripper/remuxer. I got higher fps with Handbrake (18-20) than with Vidcoder and StaxRIp. GT740, which is a downclocked version of GTX650. I'm using a nightly build of Handbrake-CLI, and trying to use the nvenc_av1 encoder, which does exist according to the --help menu of Handbrake-CLI. Took 1 hour to encode. The chart also shows that you can chose AV1 and still gain quality even on the fast settings if you're willing to spend the time. For a start NVENC is never going to achieve the same quality as CPU encoding at a given bitrate so you should generally be as generous as possible if you must use NVENC. Gpu is also less efficient, meaning bigger files for the same quality. 265 10-bit is usually between 4-10gb, depending on the movie (I try and retain as much quality and passthrough as possible). NVEnc quality has been very good since the 1XXX series cards came out (it was still "decent" before that). I have three possible scenarios for rendering a project edited in Premiere: 1 - Using AME: I’ve heard is the worst option. Grain tune for x264/x265 only really works when combined with a really high quality (high file size) encode. It’s not that much lower quality, more than acceptable, the main thing that’s keeping me from transcoding is the freezing bug that I’m getting. When you get into things like Vulcan and DX12 games that hammer the GPU so mercilessly that NVENC quality has to be lowered to avoid encoder overloads x264 looks appealing again. Tested alots of movies and anime using very high quality source. As for time, I am happy with anything under 1 hr for a 30 minute video. Pick 2. If you have plenty of space, H265 (NVENC) may be fine. 1 There is settings AV1 QuickSync (10-bit), Preset quality and CRF 24. As far as hardware encoders go, NVENC is the best one, Intel Quicksync and AMD encoder produce lesser quality for same bitrate. I’m running Jellyfin on my main computer, which has an RTX 3080, which I’m using NVENC to encode. The perceived quality of AV1-encoded content can vary depending on encoding settings and the source material. This is the unofficial subreddit for the handbrake video conversion software (key settings): H625 10-bit, constant quality 20, encoder preset "slower" [1] and pass thru the best available audio track - the soundtrack is important to me. For the best quality:size efficiency, I like the 22 RF Slow encode. Log In / Sign Up; Advertise It will give you a better result than the hardware encoder, which means for the same video quality, I’m a little confused about nvenc and I guess encoding in general, or at least the end results. There could be some benefits if you used software x265 on handbrake since it's more efficient than hardware GPU encoding but can't be run in real time during the recording. If the user or in this case Handbrake Best system for NVENC encoding? I currently have a system with an i9-10850K, 16GB of DDR4 RAM, and a GTX 1660 Super, which encodes NVENC at 4K at about 21-25fps using Nvidia designed its nvenc with two overall settings low latency for game streaming and high quality for encoding video movies. It is important to consider that the correlation between Handbrake CRF and the resulting VMAF score varies greatly depending on the type of content. You should experiment a bit. But I have a 2018 pascal card and Handbrake recognizes it. Recommended settings for the x264 and x265 encoders:. fr), this sub is for information exchange and helping out, not affiliated with the developers. 4584 This is the unofficial subreddit for the handbrake video conversion software (handbrake. In the first case (avc1) video quality will be poor (regardless of source quality) Placebo is unbearingly long and gives worse quality, slowest will give the closest to the original quality as possible, but you probably won’t tell the difference between that, slower, and slow. HandBrake includes support for hardware-accelerated encoding using NVIDIA’s NVENC technology, which leverages the GPU to speed up the It goes quicker with my gpu i can do say a 2hr movie under 10 mins with my gpu and the quality still looks amazing on my tv. What would be the best setting to keep the same quality as original, but without making the file heavier? (Transcoding 1080p/265 Content on i5-13600k with QuickSync : PleX (reddit. Nvenc is faster no doubt but file sizes can be double in size. On the CPU side I personally find I can't push 1080p below 2000kbps without a noticeable reduction in quality, so I generally aim for ~3000kbps. Expand user menu Open settings menu. 264 Rate Control: CBR 32000 Kbps Keyframe Interval: 0 Preset: P7 I have found this usually results in a final file that is a quarter of the size or less. 265 compared to H. Encoding Presets: The quest for quality often comes at the cost of https://handbrake. 265 (x265)", and all other settings remained the same. The Intel takes about an hour and 15 minutes while the NVENC takes about 30 minutes. I have a low end computer with a Ryzen 3 2200g my videos are recorded on 720p 30 fps, but the file size is too much for me to keep loads of, so the question is, what settings should I be running to keep good quality in the video and for the file size to be less than the original. So this gives me all sorts of encoding options in handbrake. Each of these used the H. Hi folks, I'm questioning the Handbrake settings when using Constant Quality instead of avg. from what I've read, cpu > QSV (which may be > or =) NVENC when it comes to quality, and the opposite for file size, encoding time. you can do it with a few short minutes video to test and compare. Export/Deliver sent to 265 MP4 1080. There's some guides on tuning NVENC for h265 but it seems like they don't exist for AV1 quite yet so I looked through the available flags and started playing around. i did some testing with 4k clips (raw quality) encoded to arc a380 qsv av1 and 4090 nvenc av1 vs hevc for both qsv and nvenc -- the average fps speed for av1 at best quality preset for both: nvenc 61. I understand that NVEnc is much faster because it uses my GPU, but why is the compression totally different? This was a 36 minute video. QuickSync is a good alternative, but its not as good as NVENC. For each of these conversions, I used identical settings except I changed the Constant Quality option in HandBrake. I use some unusual settings, but in choosing a constant quality setting I use the Preview feature, try to pick a more difficult section (that's dark or has smoke or fog), and start with 24. Will I notice a quality difference if I reencode a video? I have a device that can play 10-bit but just wondering if its worth it This is the unofficial subreddit for the handbrake video conversion software Same as source Video Encoder: H. Pick two, as they say. Better visuals smaller files. H265 has smaller file sizes but you can run into compatibility issues with some Plex apps/devices. A good balance should be using DNxHR SQ. And I'll be honest I've decided to stick with x265 over AV1 as well. Sadly, based on this page, it seems like "HandBrake supports the NVIDIA NVENC encoder but does not support the NVDEC decoder. Some stuff of mine will be like 4gbs but still will have like 7000 bittrate. And starting with 10 votes, 12 comments. But visually, for most people, either Quicksync or As I wrote in #2392 ffmpeg's default encoding bitrate when using NVEnc is around 2000kbit/s independently of the source (tried with 1080p and 4k). This is the unofficial subreddit for the handbrake video conversion r/handbrake A chip A close button. It'll take longer, but you'll get a better quality-to-size ratio. 265 (x256), it compressed to 564MB When I used H. 265 (x265) option) if I want a slightly smaller file Framerate: Same as source Encoder Preset: slowest (Usually hits ~300fps for 1080 and about 4x for lower resolutions) Constant quality: Depends. In general you’re going to need a QP lower than the RF you would use. Upgrading to a 40series would be a 8th gen nvenc which could also do av1. My goal is, and always has been, to reduce the 4k REMUX file size so that is as small as possible, but yet retains the image as close to the source-quality as possible, as viewed on my 65" Sony Bravia XBR65850 TV. QSV seems the lowest quality (stars get eaten on a space scene), NVENC is better quality wish at the same bitrate so far (stars were visible) and a little faster, x264 was better but so close to NVENC that you can only see the difference side by side, but on my hardware it only saved me about 2 minutes of encoding for a 90 minute length video. 1GB. Then re-encode at h265 Hardware adjusting the quality until you obtain the same file size. So the 4070 has one 8th Gen NVENC while the 4070 TI has two. That is a remux (mkvtoolnix) rather than a transcode (handbrake). So let's put encoding time aside and talk about the quality and efficiency (quality/file size) . Obviously that is due to a loss in fidelity. 4mb gets you around vmaf score of 90 then gains drop off hard. When I used H. File size increased to 10. The CPU encoded clip will have higher quality. 265 (Nvidia NVEnc) or CPU encoding (H. " So, your best bet for speed is likely to run multiple handbrake instances simultaneously. I’m trying to figure the best render setup for the highest quality and I have some doubts. Some in short, I've got a problem with handbrakecli not recognizing my CUDA capaple GPU whereas the Handbrake GUI is using that GPU just fine. 1 Advanced options: strong-intra-smoothing=0:rect=0:aq-mode=1. Canvas: 3840x2160 Output: 2560x1440 FPS: 60 Encoder: NVENC H. H. That being said, regardless of what Nvidia says, NVENC is not as good as x264 (CPU) encoding in terms of quality. If you turn on the spatial_aq and temporal_aq parameters in HandBrake, it very closely resembles the CPU's workflow of a typical encode. It looks closer to MEDIUM or SLOW in quality. Resolve: GPU processing on. It's a bit scary that you don't understand that handbrake is destructive. 949MiB NVENC_10bit_MEDIUM_QC0. I found that NVENC H265 will do a pretty decent job but is far less efficient (needs much more bitrate to look as good). 265 however with this one I Yes newer cards produce much better hw encoding quality and also better file sizes. if you want smaller files, go to something like 22) Encoder Preset: Medium Encoder Tune: None Encoder Profile: Main 10 Encoder Level: 4. Would anyone be able to let me know what Constant Quality they use for NVENC X265 1080p? I have been experimenting with it, and 30 Constant Quality with the 'slowest' preset seems to provide a great output with a good reduction in file size. I even tested on QSV IRIS Xe iGPU. 264/H. There’s no way to use the Nvidia GPU and not use NVENC. Visual quality subjectively indistinguishable from the input file on a 4k monitor. No way should it be losing to Nvenc. I'd like anyones opinions on whether the picture quality is noticeably better when encoding in H. When I was using medium, darker colors would be washed out when there was movement. RF 18-22 for 480p/576p Standard Definition 1; RF 19-23 for 720p High Definition 2; RF 20-24 for 1080p Full High Definition 3; RF 22-28 for 2160p 4K Ultra High Definition 4; Quality slider at 20 Using H264 NVenc Constant framerate, same as source Encoder set at slow Haven't touched any audio or resolution setting The encoded movie is 2. The file size ended up being 7 gig and took 18 minutes to render. So I am using Handbrake snapshot to get AV1 NVENC support. Also, using NLMeans as a denoise filter quadrupled encoding times, so be mindful of that too. The log is below, but if I use software decoding for H264 or 265 it flat refuses to encode. g. I Apologies for this age old nvenc vs x265 question. x264 Medium at like CRF20 will probably give you more compact files and slightly better visual quality. New comments /r/hardware is a place for quality computer hardware news, reviews, and intelligent I’m trying to figure the best render setup for the highest quality and I have some doubts. I'm using Xeon 2191B with x265 SLOWER preset and 1080ti with x265 SLOWEST preset. Log In / Sign Up; I won't be reencoding with CPU anyway (wayy too loud for a long time and my PC is in my bedroom), I'll need to use NVEnc and therefore high quality reencodes will have a I'm in the process of compressing all my video files using handbrake, and I've seen confusing recommendations online, and in the documentation, as to what RF/quality rating to use for certain resolutions. Quality is the only thing I am concerned with (due to the upscaling). The only real application where nvenc beats CPU encoding is high quality real-time capture / transcoding. Good balance of quality and file size. Hi, Just got a 4080. This can significantly reduce encoding I'm accepting of the trade-off in quality & slightly higher bitrate, for the enormous speed increase (aren't we all), but I just want to see how comparable they can realistically be. m4v 514MiB NVENC_10bit_SLOWEST_QC30. Lots of peoples comments are based on old cards (like a 10x0 series). The nvenc encodes will still give larger files for the same quality, but it’s not as significant as previous generations. Although I must say that it is not convenient to use Slower or Placebo. I think tje speed may influence this? Just about to start playing around with medium instead of slow. CPU 12900k. but when I do 2 or 3 encodes simultaneously (only one instance of HB open) it reaches full usage. and the quality was noticeably worse than using NVenc although the file size was 2 gig smaller, 5 rather than 7. It's more on the other end of the preset If I do HEVC NVENC 10-bit, I'll get around 25-30 FPS, which is much more reasonable. Yep VCE is especially shit, QS is not much better, nvenc The hardware encoders including QSV and NVenc do have adjustable encode settings that let you adjust this balance between speed and encode quality/efficiency. However, on my GTX1650 Super which has the Turing 116 Looks like the 20 and 30series both use the 7th gen nvenc encoder which includes b-frame support. 6. (going on passmark's CPU benchmark score, r/handbrake: This is the r/handbrake A chip A close button. You might find, as I did, that using QS in constant quality mode, you'll get pretty good results. I can get things to run fast and the quality will be good , but the size will be large. Its really good, just the filesize is around 2x as larger as x265 with the default SLOW/SLOWER 20 preset. To be fair, Nvidia has one of the best H265 encoders (with Intel’s newest QSV encoders being a close second) with regards to image quality and size. This morning I transcoded Watchmen. I've always used H264 because if I use 265 NVEnc, I won't be able to watch the video until I upload it to Youtube, which can be inconvenience if I want to double check the quality. 264 (AVC) encoder from AMD lags behind substantially in terms of image integrity, image stability and compression artefacts compared to Only a few select low end GT cards does have NVENC e. I don't care about how long it takes to encode as I can let it run for days if needed. 7 came out and I wanted to know using my gpu is there anyway to use nvenc and still keep hdr10+ and dolby vision hdr metadata? Locked post. for the same level of quality, hardware encoding needs more bitrate. Here we can see that Nvidia NvEncoder is currently I've found that GPU encodes have a lower quality that gets noticeable on larger screens and with scenes that have lots of fast changing colors and movement. (For reference I am generally compressing 1080p footage) Encode a chapter at h265 Software encode quality 18 and note the file size. Am I doing something wrong? This is the unofficial subreddit for the handbrake video conversion software (handbrake. Now, I am aware hardware encoding isn't as efficient as CPU encoding. Encoder Preset: The time you want it to take to compress. 264 encodes. Before few days I bought new PC with Intel Core i5-12400, 64GB DDR4 3200MHz, 2TB SSD nvme, Intel Arc A770 16GB, Windows 11 Pro 22H2, Handbrake 1. What is the difference between CQ and RF in Handbrake? And if I am willing to sacrifice storage space (as long as the resulting file is still worth the hassle smaller than remux), what CQ number for 4K HDR movies would be eqivalent to a decent (I assume 20 for 4K) RF number of x265? You are wasting time and reducing its quality for no reason. The "NVenc at RF0 Slowest" (not lossless because of NVenc reasons apparently) retains the most quality at a file of 6. Good to know. Use NVenc or QSV and no issues. 5 fps and qsv 70 fps. The NVENC encode is surprisingly not daft for the quality:size ratio. NVENC on 20 series and newer cards under x. After that it's subjective -- how much I care about what I'm encoding, and what resolution I am encoding to affect how I will adjust the slider. 265 (VideoToolbox) Framerate (FPS) -> Same as Source Use Variable Framerate Use Constant Quality -> CQ40 I output (Summary Tab) to MKV, and include only the English Audio & Subtitles. 265 (NVEnc) it compressed to 1. 265 (NVenc) encoder with all the other video options on their default settings. . The table below illustrates the results of converting the file using different Constant Quality options – all into 1080p video. I have been doing NVENC x265 slow mode encodes on my 1080 Ti using a nightly build of Handbrake for a while now. Reddit's home for let's players, streamers, and any other kind of gaming content creator! Check out the NVEnc documentation. 5GB which is a competitive size. With just Handbrake tests I'm having a hard time telling the difference between NVENC QP30 and X265 CRF25 (sw on i7-7700K). Render time :41 secods. A constant quality encode lets you choose the image quality level you want and Handbrake, will encode to that level, the file size you will only know at the end. I'm saying if you set up say an NVENC encode so it ends up with a similar file size to an x264 encode of the same data, the quality will be total shit. AV1 pushes quality reduction further, to the point where the background suffers: AV1 is indeed designed to push compression efficiency further, but it doesn't inherently mean background quality always suffers. Well - NVENC does encode to h265, but it uses the GPU. In reality, only very few "newer uarch" low end cards are available besides GT1030, all based on Keplar, which didn't come with NVENC. This is the unofficial subreddit for the handbrake video conversion software for some of the hardware encoders they do better with a bitrate target than a quality target. Do some tests with cut video from 1 min to 12 core Ryzen RTX 3070Ti (Staxrip NVENC) Microsoft laptop 5 i5 Iris XE (Staxrip QSV rigaya) Intel NUC 12 i7 Iris XE (Handbrake docker QSV) Best results are from laptop 5 Staxrip QSV - rigaya. The lack of lower end GPUs(with new uarch) from Nvidia further emphasized this disadvantage. That said, *at that bitrate* H. I'm transcoding from AVC to AV1 and Nvdec remains unused, while my 7950x is at 50% usage during encoding. If you're happy with the results, All the other films were done via H. Yes, I am well aware hardware encode is inferior to software encode in terms of quality but I'm mostly just playing around with it. You can use it to either reduce the file size for the same quality, or improve the quality but keep the file size. 265 NVENC". Also, I'm a Vidcoder user, but tried QSV AV1 with Vidcoder, StaxRip, and Handbrake and Handbrake seemed to encode much faster using same settings. Secondly, you can use set bitrate with both GPU/NVENC encode jobs and/or CPU encode jobs. That gives you the equivalent quality level to match Hardware vs Software encoding. And the scales appear to be backwards for the quality settings with hardware encode. You can use a different front-end like VidCoder and set the file size to come out to be the same, but NVENC will be lower quality. It's just that the best quality/efficiency it can do is not nearly as much as the best a software encoder can do on a CPU. 0. Topaz labs is a paid program but is well worth it compare to Handbrake. If you need further reduction with limited quality impact then use the Constant Quality setting in handbrake together with h. Encoding with all presets seems to be very fast with not-so-good output and large files. It means if you choose h265 preset slow CRF18 it's not the same quality than h265 preset medium CRF18. Isn't the whole point of AV1 to preserve visual quality while reducing file size? The NVENC AV1 does not I went to do convert a video file and couldn't understand why for higher definition videos Handbrake recommends using lower quality such as 20-23. Render time 6:31. Is quality as Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. e. However, it is more computationally complex. Without using NVenc it took 10 minutes longer to render 265 10-bit. Get app Get the Reddit app Log In Log in to Reddit. time saving is not worth it. so there you go. If all you are trying to do is to convert the episodes in mp4 then don't use handbrake, it's a waste of time. Members Online I'm converting a webm file to mp4, but the preview Encoder Choice: Handbrake offers both CPU and GPU encoding. 8mb gets you to maybe 93. If you have an Nvidia GPU, use the AV1 NVENC encoder for fast how does the nvenc quality compare at 100mbps slowest vs cpu at placebo, are they mostly the same? Are there any known settings I can use to match them in terms of quality? CPU encoding is quite slower in comparison to my 4090's encoders. This is the unofficial subreddit for the handbrake video conversion software (handbrake. 264 Rate Control: CBR 32000 Kbps Keyframe Interval: 0 Preset: P7 Firstly, you can encode in x265 regardless of whether you are using your CPU or GPU (i. Use the "preview" to check if the quality is acceptable. fr/ It's a GUI to configure video compression, you have option to use CPU (for best quality) or NVENC for fast encoding (in 10bits!) There are many documentation on reddit how to use it. Currently, I am using h. I do have an Nvidia RTX 4080 GPU NVENC targets FAST in quality and speed and overshoots both. ADMIN MOD How to preserve Dolby Vision with NVENC? I'm trying to experiment with the NVENC settings for a lossless encode as well as My NVENC settings: RF18 Constant quality Same frame rate as original file Main 10 Share Sort by From my experience with encoding, there are 3 options: speed, quality, and size. 265 10-bit (NVEnc) (this has done wonders for dvd rips) Framerate Same as Source Encoder Preset - Slower (honestly most crucial) Other notes outputfile mp4 passthru common meta data AAC (avcodec), Stereo audio stuff (I to be more specific, hardware encoding isnt necessarily lower quality, but instead lower efficiency. I believe the 4070 has dual Nvenc encoders, does handbrake use both automatically? Taskmanager says Nvenc is 100%, but i'm not sure it's using both. If anything, you should check what brand of card you should get, Nvidia has NVENC, AMD has their own one and Intel has QuickSync. 22621. 2. m4v Also the full movie went from 50 GiB to 24 GiB. Handbrake is a video encoder. Great if it works for you. And they are really taking a lot of space. You might even find that reducing the RF number a couple of ticks with QS (compared to whatever setting you use for CPU) will get you roughly equivalent file sizes with as good or very slightly better quality - visually and with comparable SSIM/VMAF numbers. Simples! In this case h265 software at quality 18 was equivalent to h265 hardware at quality 64. I've been searching through reddit and various forums for the whole day and I'm very confused Quality-wise, any encode of a bluray will degrade the quality more - you're trying to stuff a 50GB discs into something smaller. Any ideas? HandBrake Nightly 20240315064525-943991ccd-master (2024031501) OS: Microsoft Windows NT 10. 265 is better than H. EDIT: Not with FFmpeg. It usually takes a couple of hours. The thing is, h265 on the CPU has about 2x-3x the efficiency (as in, quality per filesize) compared to h265 NVENC. 5hr movie i got around 12. Yes all the replies are correct. For software encoding the lower the quality number the higher the quality, but for hardware encoding it appears to be the other way around. Upon trying to use this encoder in Tdarr, i get the following error: ERROR: Invalid video encoder (nvenc_av1) Failed to initialize job HandBrake has exited. Intel QSV, and NVIDIA NVENC, also have quality-based encoder presets to enable advanced features that can I had to bump the constant quality up to 26 on NVENC to get to the same bitrate on NVENC than on standard h265. hardware encoding is entirely capable of encoding at the same quality level as software encoding, the main issue with it being that it cannot do so at the same bitrate. I have two main problems: Number 1 - getting Handbrake to address both NVENC chips. Quality 21, "Slowest" speed, MKV container, 320 audio, subs included in the container. You get NVENC regardless of what you use, if you are Quality: Constant quality, 20 RF (there's room for preference. With crf when set what. I think generally speaking NVENC on the newest cards is superior to QSV. NVENC AV1 encoding using the exact same settings otherwise, took 9min 56s. 265. 265 to set the quality level. 83GB Hi, Just got a 4080. I see whoever voted you down didn't take the time to chip in with their experiences. Sometimes an h265 is bigger than the h264 with the same quality, which is odd. the tradeoff is that nvenc h265 took around 30min to encode while x265 10-bit took around 1hr (this varies with the type of But picking the same value for both does not get you the same quality output. But from everything I have read, NVENC vs CPU encoding there will always be a small hit to quality when using NVENC. What RF quality and speed do you recommend for a quality similar to the above H264 settings? I care about quality most, file size next. Visual quality same. . They take a long time and do not provide exceptional quality compared to I do look to the backgrounds to look for flaws in my encodes, but Liam's face looks pretty good to me in every example. That's the wrong way to look at GPU usage for NVENC; The Ti card will make no difference to Handbrake at all. 5gb using nvenc h265 (which isn't horrible i guess) and around 4gb using x265 10-bit. If filesize/bitrate is not a concern for you, then go right ahead and use NVENC. But that is me and I am decidedly not an expert. I would do a couple of previews with both and see what they look like. What codec does Handbrake use for QSV encoding? Constant quality RF: The quality you want the video to have. At just over 2 hours and 40 minutes long, the transcode took 25 minutes. What are you trying to achieve with the encoding exactly? Because 370mb seems already quite small. x265 over nvenc all day, the better efficiency is well worth the wait imo. Lately I have been playing with H265. Were any advanced options used? Why or why not? This is the unofficial subreddit for the handbrake video conversion software The new 1. So I have a gtx gpu, and an intel cpu. For pre-text i'm using placebo encode speed for maximum efficiency (I don't care about time) if setting constant Quality to 50 slices my video into like 2 pixels and 0 is lossless quailty for that 24907259097375027 pixels, why does the suggestions say 20-22 for Blue-ray quality (what I view as 4k) and 20-18 for Disc (what I view as 1080p) when the values should be switched around? Would anyone be able to let me know what Constant Quality they use for NVENC X265 1080p? I have been experimenting with it, and 30 Constant Quality with the 'slowest' preset seems to provide a great output with a good reduction in file size. 265 NVENCE 10-bit . But if you select Nvenc in handbrake it doesn't make sense as I said since it's the same codec used for the I'm using h265 with nvenc for hardware acceleration. It falls back in terms of quality per bitrate. I know software is better, but sometimes I need it to be faster instead of taking all day XD and heard turing/ampere is equivalent to h264 (and gives me a chance to use my new gpu!)? I feel so lost with this, googling didn't really help me. NVENC) to do so. the tradeoff is that nvenc h265 took around 30min to encode while x265 10-bit took around 1hr (this varies with the type of Gostaríamos de exibir a descriçãoaqui, mas o site que você está não nos permite. It's completely up to you whether you set things up for max quality, max speed, minimum file size, or some combination thereof. Any software encoded video comes HandBrake includes support for hardware-accelerated encoding using NVIDIA’s NVENC technology, which leverages the GPU to speed up the encoding process. None of them really beat software/CPU encoding though in terms of quality (x264/x265), GPU encoding is just a lot faster (and on the newest NVIDIA graphics cards, NVENC is arguably as good as some of the medium speed CPU processing). No special argument used. Does it mean in terms of encoding, This is the unofficial subreddit for the handbrake video conversion software and CPU encoding gives you the best quality/size ratio at the expense of speed. scale out rather than scale up. You would think that running two instances of Handbrake would then utilise both chips but according to task manager, this is not the case. It's a fancy GUI for x264 (with some extra functionality). The NVENC compresses by 1% with no discernable loss. slow. The performance gain is well worth it - especially when transcoding H. I assume you mean "H. Both tests performed with the same x265 1080p content, PMS has the same settings in terms of quality and transcode. There's actually a decode process going on whenever you play a video. 95Go, while the original file is 735Mo. bitrate. I’m used to encoding using h265 nvenc with handbrake. 15. But. Hey guys kinda new handbrake user here 😇, so I was kinda on vacation recently where I recorded a bit of videos "well a lot actually 😂" from my phone. The 1080ti encoding still much quicker than CPU. 265 on CPU vs GPU for the last week or so on 1080p Bluray rips and somehow NVEnc always delivers sub-par results. Primarily that using the Nvidia GPU means using NVENC, which is the encoding block inside the GPU. 264 with a target around 15Mbits with 'Hardware acceleration' Need suggestion on options for NVENC (ampere) h265 10 bit for 1080p content. Only if GPU in best quality is not good enough, does CPU makes sense and then only at an even better quality setting, meaning far far slower. The other Nvenc AV1 software that supports 4000 series cards is Topaz Labs. ADMIN MOD How to preserve Dolby Vision with NVENC? I'm trying to experiment with the NVENC settings for a lossless encode as well as My NVENC settings: RF18 Constant quality Same frame rate as original file Main 10 Share Sort by Well, it depends. File size was reduced to 3GB. Video will be transcoded using a low bitrate avc1 codec or medium bitrate vp9 codec anyway. Just curious if NVENC H265 can get close to the quality of x264 without creating files that are much larger. 2 - Using Voukouder: I’ve heard it’s faster and have more options. The slower the better. 0 CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-14900K Ram: 65298 MB, GPU Information: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 - 31. It compresses/re-encodes video (which is destructive). I use the preview to get the highest number without a major loss in quality. 265 which is an order of magnitude faster using HW. Intel QuickSync seems as good as NVENC when it works, losing ever so slightly in one test and winning ever so Handbrake documentation "Video Encoding Speed" talks about two things: “Video Preset” slider and Filters. They take a long time and As for NVEnc, while it's faster than QS, QS still, typically produces better results (unless your on an older generation CPU). That cpu h264 graph looks off. You will find its about quality vs speed, with both based on the speed setting. x265 is the codec, NVENC is simply using your GPU as a hardware encoder. using the same sample my Intel QSV 265 (2018) compresses the sample by 60% with no discernable loss. NVENC seems to pull ahead when the source has a high bitrate in these tests but is dead even with VCN when the bitrate is dropped to 15Mb/s. This is the unofficial subreddit for the handbrake video Own_Ad_2272. Hello, For 4K game video, should I stick with H264 setting or use 265 NVEnc? Encoder preset will be slow and quality will be 18. 265 NVENC to H. So quality should be the same for hevc encodes. Start at 22, that should reduce your file However i have not been able to compare image quality, as i dont have scientific software/hardware for it. For example, in Handbrake only Intel QuickSync does 10/12-bit HEVC It's more intended for fast performance while gaming in order to reduce CPU load. I then changed the video encoder to "H. Edit depends on cpu vs hw too for quality baseline. When you select just h265 without NVEnc, it's done on your CPU - but that's a different encoder. If file size is important to you, avoid using GPU encoding (nvenc). 264 or Nvidia's NVENC encoder for the re-encode? Would encoding from the MP4 file create a noticible loss in quality? My PC has an GPU's (NVEnc, VCE, QuickSync) can do it a lot faster, but you trade off with a slight lowering of quality CPU's (x264/x265) offer the best quality and file size, but can take the longest to do the job (as you have probably found out) A lot of these settings and what they do can easily be researched by hovering over the option. Cores and Threads on your CPU don't really influence this. 1 on an M1 MacBook Pro (on Blurays): Video Encoder -> H. 264 codec. Altogether, NvEnc is the clear winner at "quality production per seconds", whenever this quality is measure through PSNR, SSIM or VMAF. For reference, my tests have all been at RF18 RF20 and RF22. Almost forgot, it was 1080p. In terms of quality NVENC is far better than VCN (AMD), but performance is going to be nearly identical, and you will get better fps with either than if you're encoding on your CPU. I'm using Xeon 2191B with x265 SLOWER preset The "NVenc at RF0 Slowest" (not lossless because of NVenc reasons apparently) retains the most quality at a file of 6. Speed, File Size or Quality. It looks like AV1 will be There's a lot to unpack here. 30 megabits is gigantic. To me the slower I set the gpu the better quality I got compared to the Video Encoder: H. Supposedly the claim was that it was about Medium when compared to CPU encodes. Looks like the 20 and 30series both use the 7th gen nvenc encoder which includes b-frame support. Or check This is the unofficial subreddit for the handbrake video conversion ADMIN MOD H. Using NVENC, I can get files that are around 40% off the size of the original and with no noticeable difference in quality. I wouldn’t recommend using a hardware encoder to encode BD rips. I was using rigaya encoders for both. These Hardware Encoders are pre-tuned for Speed performance thus sacrificing quality compression gains that are present in software encoders with a full set of configurable parameters. I'm not concerned about it being more efficent / space saving etc, just like for like quality against the same source. To me, because it is high definition, I thought it would be even more important to be set to a higher quality (lower RF). 265 (HVEC) video encoded to AV1 from the result of DaVinci Resolve using Handbrake with setting like AV1 10-bit/40RF/preset 7 (108MB), AV1 10 bits/38RF/preset 6(124MB), Reddit's most popular camera brand-specific subreddit!. Under the Video tab, Video Encoder H. Results can be replicated on Plex Web and the Samsung TV app. But I'm not going for super high quality, just enough to be watchable. NVENC is actually not far off of software, though I would still use software encoding. I'm sure it is ok if you know what you're doing but the few encodes I did with it weren't amazing quality visually, and it especially didn't seem to work well with HDR af all, so I didn't stick with it. “Video Preset” (in Video tab) slider seems straightforward. If you are uploading to youtube you dont need super high quality. HandBrake’s software video encoders, video filters, audio encoders, and other processes benefit from fast CPU and memory. With my 3070, i used to get between 300-400 fps (1080p video) With the 4080 i Only get 180-200fps (same video) Encoder on the 4080 is only used at about 30% (as show in task manager infos) But from everything I have read, NVENC vs CPU encoding there will always be a small hit to quality when using NVENC. 265 at 10-bit right now as far as I know. Am new to handbrake and is quite confused. I'm considering upscaling a TV series that I had previously encoded for Plex from 480p to 720p. ) And at the Encoder Preset there is no plasebo. I have streamed for years and I've used all three. Video not edited. On both systems it takes around 6,5-7 days of encoding (Handbrake can’t full utilized dual-CPU system 😢). This is the unofficial subreddit for the handbrake video conversion software The quality of the conversion is really good and very fast albeit it produces files which are circa twice the size of my previous h. You sadly can't just run the exact same encoder with the power of your GPU. Timline is 4k. Same with QP. With 4k Blu-Rays this is usually not a problem, as the quality is so high already. For my Blu Ray collection, I use RF 22/h264/Slow encode preset. You can test your settings by encoding and watching short clips using HandBrake’s Preview feature. Some of my stuff is like 7000 bittrate and i never noticed any low quality. Would you mind sharing what kind of settings you were using for that? I've been experimenting with H. true. But it really delivers better quality than AME? Will simultaneous encodes affect quality or is it just the same? So, I've noticed that x265 doesn't use 100% of my CPU. In handbrake, I am more curious about "Encoder preset" scale when using H. I can get small size and good quality but it runs slow. There is no way to know which one handbrake is So just did a test of a 4k Blu-ray and thought you might like to see the results. Audio. I can get still amazing quality on my gpu. Am I doing something wrong? Hello, And welcome to the community! For editing: Like u/The_real_Hresna said, you should consider using a DNxHR or ProRes codec for editing it's much better suited and the quality is better than re-encoding it into a H. For better compression inside HandBrake the best encoder is H. I run everything through a CRF of 20 HEVC on the slowest setting. And GPU is better quality at any given speed within its range. Under hardware chose H. 265" under "Video Encoder" in the Video tab. Wondering which AV1 quality setting will give the quality equivalent to H. 83GB Hey guys kinda new handbrake user here 😇, so I was kinda on vacation recently where I recorded a bit of videos "well a lot actually 😂" from my phone. So for my 1080p Blu-rays I use Handbrake, retain everything and from a 50gb Blu ray disc the final product H. I’ve got all the nvenc options, all the qsv options, all the regular software options. Should I still use H. 265 10-bit (x265), RF (not RQ) is a Constant Quality value, that indicates a quality threshold (relative to all the other settings, not absolute) where larger number is lower quality, Preset veryslow means it takes longer to process as it takes more information into account (which results in higher quality and smaller size for a given RF {for Will simultaneous encodes affect quality or is it just the same? So, I've noticed that x265 doesn't use 100% of my CPU. If you can't handle big files, use H. 265 10-bit (NVEnc) (this has done wonders for dvd rips) Framerate Same as Source Encoder Preset - Slower (honestly most crucial) Other notes outputfile mp4 passthru common meta data AAC (avcodec), Stereo audio stuff (I Handbrake documentation "Video Encoding Speed" talks about two things: “Video Preset” slider and Filters. If you aren't already, I'd do some tests throwing multiple encodes rather than just trying to speed one encode up, i. Personally I love it, it works like 3-4x realtime speed, I can do two encodes at once (although this needs 2 instances of Handbrake open), and IMO the quality is fine when I target around 4GB for a Blu-ray rip. 265 NVENC 1080p. And while they are amazing quality a video of 1 minute is 300mb 😂, they are full HD videos. Therefor, in testing, it's not matching the efficiency of x264. for intel av1, the quality settings dont matter much because the hardware encoder is very fast, but i was testing using a throttle laptop. It is taking me 20 mins to process this in handbrake for a 34 minute long 20GB file. Topaz labs Nvenc AV1 encoding using only the GPU and max's it out where as Handbrake is still using a fair amount of CPU when encoding Nvenc AV1 with a 4000 series GPU Need suggestion on options for NVENC (ampere) h265 10 bit for 1080p content. I tried and compared QSV, NVenc, and CPU for both 2pass and CRF. Equally, you may increase the speed for the encoding process by changing the parameters which could result in CPU having higher speed than GPU but for better quality. Well that's the thing - the CPU is still superior when it comes to quality and GPUs are designed to be much faster HOWEVER my understanding is that RTX 2000 series and up (including your 3060) have improved NVENC quality. Regardless, QSV and NVenc always have much bigger size and worse quality than CPU. For anyone concerned about nvenc quality, That said, the Quadro P2000/P4000 have excellent quality. I use CQ of 20 and I use the highest quality preset. I have a 2018 pascal card and Handbrake recognizes it. Test is to process same in Handbrake and Davinci Resolve Studio (Paid) handbrake: Nvidia processing on in Preferences. Whereas the film tuning is kind of a sidegrade with no significant drawbacks, grain's one significant drawback is that you need a lot more bits for it to look respectable. I guess that's why you can't do it with Handbrake either. The default NVEnc encoding setting is that every region is at a constant quantization parameter through the entire encode. 264, is what I usually use), then I'll get about 40-50fps when ripping from a BluRay source on my machine. Handbrake file is smaller. the file size. Even picking the same RF with different encoder settings gets you somewhat different quality. I understand that for any given CF level, I'll get much larger file using NVENC, but for now, for the purposes my library I'm ok with the quality I'm getting out of NVENC vs. NVENC is not terrible as long as you If your goal is to create 720p encodes of a specific file size, a constant quality encode is not designed to do that. Ensure you've selected the mighty "NVENC H. You can lose a lot of quality off a 100 GB video file before it starts to noticeably degrade at a movie watching distance from Using Handbrake v1. 265 (NVEnc) Video: 1080p Framerate: Same as source, variable framerate Encoder preset: Slow Encoder profile, Encoder level: Auto Quality: 25CQ (I know that recommendation is 23CQ for HD, but doesn't reduce size enough) By eye, I don't see a difference, it takes 3 minute to convert one episode which is fine. 265 AMD-VCE FPS: Same as source Constant Quality: 22 QP. Even if I crank the settings, quality doesn't seem to The SVT-AV1 encoder presets are pretty reasonably spaced out in encoding time and quality for size, like x264 encoder presets are. Finding some encoding benchmarks on AMD hardware is your best bet I'd say. Handbrakecli is located in the Would anyone be able to let me know what Constant Quality they use for NVENC X265 1080p? I have been experimenting with it, and 30 Constant Quality with the 'slowest' preset seems to Problem description: The slider goes 6 settings: High Quality, High Performance, Fast, Medium, Slow, Default. AC3 Passthrough - I find I can leave the audio uncompressed. for a 2. 264 software on slow setting, though it will lag behind software x. Still NVENC looked really well, only in a side by side comparison could i tell. 265 nvenc, which goes from left called "high Quality" to the right called "Slow" with fast presets in between. So the filesize will be smaller and the quality worse. NVenc will also typically require modestly more bitrate (thus larger files) to hit a target quality level. This is fast, but not high quality or very efficient. But it really delivers better quality than AME? Nvenc, amf and quicksync to name the three prominent ones. I'm also assuming that you've removed the cooler to check your thermal paste application or tried using a higher quality thermal paste? It needs to decode the video into frames that the GPU can then encode. Hello. Reply reply Constant Quality - 18 Video Encoder H. I found that, yes I am sacraficing time for quality and getting a slightly larger file size but the quality was better. The compression is much less for the same quality. Can I get the same results as cpu encoding, target being 10bit x265, with NVENC, I then compress to H264, usually at RF18 and slow preset. Recommended quality settings. The difference is significant. 264 with a target around 15Mbits with 'Hardware acceleration' Primarily that using the Nvidia GPU means using NVENC, which is the encoding block inside the GPU. Encoder: NVENC AV1 Rate Control: VBR 22000 - 50000 Kbps Keyframe Interval: 0 Preset: P7 Tuning: High Quality Multipass Mode: Single Pass Psycho Visual Tuning: enabled Max B-frames: 2 Profile 2. The software encodes have more functions to improve the quality or the size. The only reason I brought this up is because I initially wanted to re-encode videos quickly for YouTube, which is why I wanted to use NVENC, but Handbrake doesn't let me change bframes and keyint to conform to YouTube's recommendations. gnynsat dsqstw fbcdvkm hjeny hlh godqc jcdb zsf vigbl vryf